Joanna Newsom: Have Three On Me
Criticizing an album before anyone's ever heard it would be a bizarre thing to do. Bizarrely, I think I'm going do just that.
Y'see, I'm just a little concerned about one of my favorite artists.
Joanna Newsom's Ys was one of my favorite albums of the last ten years, but she's announced her follow up, Have One On Me, is going to be a triple. There's no track listing yet, but whatever it is will be released on 3xCDs, or 3xLPs.
Is
there actually such a thing as a great triple album? Serious question,
I'd like to know. There must be a few, but even still - wouldn't they be improved by having a few
lesser tracks chopped off to make it a more manageable double album? In
fact, wouldn't the vast majority of double albums be improved by being
edited down to a single?
I tend to feel that 35-50 minutes is the best length for an album, because shorter than that feels a little too short, but longer is kinda tiring. But how tiring a record is depends on what kind of music it is, too.
Aphex Twin's triple LP (or double CD) Selected Ambient Works II is over two-and-a-half hours of featureless ambiance. Even though that's a long time to do anything (a long time to have headphones on, say), it's easy to let it wash through you and only pick up on the broad movements of mood. On the other hand, Tupac's double-disc All Eyez On Me is 132 minutes -- nearly two-and-a-quarter hours -- and it's exhausting, because you have to listen much closer to hip-hop, to follow the lyrics. That kind of concentration is tough to keep up!
Joanna Newsom is not exactly easy to listen to in the first place. Her voice is polarizing, but even for those of us who like it, Ys, at 55 minutes long, was quite long enough, because her lyrics are so densely arranged that you really have to focus to keep up with them. We don't yet know how long Have One On Me will be, but if it's roughly three hours then that's surely too long to digest in one sitting. And if it's not meant for one sitting, why release it at all together under one name?
Joanna Newsom's music always seems very deliberate: every syllable is carefully measured, every flourish and flair under complete control. You can be sure that there's an explanation for the placing of every antique and animal figure on that cover, above, so the length of the album itself is no half-thought or accident. I imagine she must have some complex conceptual justification, I just can't imagine what it is!
Do you agree that triple albums are a bad idea? Or are you happier to get more songs from longer albums?
Have One On Me will be released on February 23rd. A new song, "Good Intentions Paving Company," is already streaming from her label Drag City's website.
Jaipur Hotels on July 30, 2010 at 01:00 PM
that's really a fantastic post ! added to my favourite blogs list.. I have been reading your blog last couple of weeks and enjoy every bit. Thanks.
pratap bhawan on July 30, 2010 at 12:58 PM
Nice article.....I really impressed while reading your post.....Thank you so much , it will useful to every one....
Nursing cover on June 30, 2010 at 08:04 PM
indeed, in fact shes my idol! love her so much, i'm dying to see her in person, but *sigh*
Renaissance Clothing on March 10, 2010 at 11:21 AM
Joanna Newsom is extremely a talented musician. There are only few people who can the harp.
Milo on February 08, 2010 at 05:13 AM
I agree Ally. Triple albums just scream "complete lack of quality control"
Ben on February 03, 2010 at 03:11 PM
The Clash's Sandinista! and George Harrison's All Things Must Pass come to mind, though both would have made better double albums than triples.
Michael on February 03, 2010 at 08:57 AM
There are 6 songs on each of the three albums tallying 2 hours and 2 minutes, which really isn't that outrageous when you consider its been 3+ years since Ys was released.
I'm expecting great things!